
Will we ever make the world we live in a peaceful, friendly and carefree environment ? ; many a times we start to wonder with so many global issues let it be poverty, illiteracy, global warming, hatred & war. As a chemist and researcher, adversities aren't new, in fact the quest for a solution by using the proven scientific concepts is almost a prerogative in our field. This led me to think if chemistry can in anyway help in any of these big challenges that we are facing in this current world.
Hybridize with the people around you:
Most of the problems around us start because, most of us dont have meaningful conversations with one another. By this i dont mean we are not receptive, we just preconceive ideas well before listening to the person around us. So lets hybridize and form those stable and strong SP3 hybrid orbitals since we will have head to head interactions and forming a shared electron covalent linkage, wherein we appreciate each ones uniqueness and react towards solutions for global welfare. Chemistry has in deed helps us with relationships. If you feel you give too much and your partner just keeps receiving things from you then you are probably in an ionic relationship. The aforementioned things does not mean just monetary things but much more important aspect of relationship like sharing conversations, spending time with one another etc. On the contrary when there is a mutual respect for one another in a relationship we end up with sharing our values, happiness, memories and a covalent type of relationship. There is a certain element of co-valency needed in every relationship.
The Hunds Rule of Budget to reach an octet:
When I see GOP proposal of the budget crafted by Rep. Paul Ryan, i start to think about politicians need to learn about Aufbau principle. Government is from the bottom up, the lowest energy orbitals gets filled first after which the next level gets occupied. People who are struggling to get by in this economic meltdown, now there issues need to be of prime focus. So if it is jobs, education, then lets prioritize those over the rest. In their budget, they also avoid to be symmetrical in their thought process. Now if they are suggesting that bush tax cuts for the wealthiest of americans need to be available since they contribute to small business and thereby create jobs, then lets keep 44.8% as the calculation for octet. To be more precise, lets keep 44.8-25 = 19.2% to be our octet number for you to be qualified for the bush tax cuts, else since you dont satisfy fairness as proposed in Hunds rule, you pay up since you dint contribute to the growth of the country.
Dextro or Levo:
Just because i expected some sort of logic in the budget proposed by dextro-wing party doesn't mean i am levorotatary. What i find strange is the handedness between them is not so clear. Their political point of views, be it in abortion, gay rights, immigration.,etc are not so different from each other to form a clear chiral (sane) center. They form only an emulsion if you ask me, saying that they are two immiscible phases and yet on most views conform to the same ideas . This is particularly true interms of the countries involvement in war and other non war movements where, they would want to give arms to rebels who may not even know how to use it. The countries involvement in wars shows the emulsion nature of these parties that are ruling this country which if it wants to be #1 in the world needs to spread peace and non-violence.
Inhibition of fat:
Another issue has been the global problem of obesity, coronary heart disease (CHD), basically the physical well-being of our human race. Drugs like Lipitor which is commonly use for coronary heart disease & diet pills like Orlistat teaches us a valuable lesson of inhibition. I am not prescribing these to be the solutions but the way the drugs act on your body teaches us how we need to act on ourselves. It works based on inhibition of some enzymes in the case of CHD to be converted to cholesterol and in the case of diet pills, fats not being absorbed as they dont get converted to fatty acids. Although there are side effects with these forms of inhibition pills, why do we torture our body and not inhibit ourselves from having not so healthy foods. Is it just because we are just not so well informed? could it be healthy food has become more expensive so we eat junk food? economy is bad, when there is no job why would i think about good food? education prices are so high, i cant wait to get out of school? it doesn't matter what job i get as long as it pays me well?
Inhibit yourself from such negative thoughts and know that world is what we make of it. Collectively, if we all want some sanity and logic in our world even in the world of politics, spread the word and there might be some amazing reactions just like in the world of chemistry.